Silicon Soapware #235
Feb. 6th, 2014 09:19 amSilicon Soapware #235 is out. Look in
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/SS0235.txt
or check out my main page at
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/SS0235.txt
or check out my main page at
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/
SILICON SOAPWARE
wafting your way along the slipstreams of the Info Highway
from Bubbles = Tom Digby
= bubbles@well.com
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/
Issue #235
New Moon of January 30, 2014
Contents copyright 2014 by Thomas G. Digby, and licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See the Creative
Commons site at http://creativecommons.org/ for details.
Silicon Soapware is available via email with or without reader feedback.
Details of how to sign up are at the end.
*********************
Groundhog Day is nigh as I start this, but will be past by the time you
see it. The holiday that will be big in the media will probably be
Valentine's Day, perhaps mixed with Presidents' Day.
When I think of Presidents' Day I get a mental image of something dull
and gray and boring, not much of a festive holiday at all. This probably
comes from my long-ago school days.
Back then there were two official February holidays, Lincoln's birthday
on February 12 and Washington's birthday on February 22. They had not
yet been consolidated into Presidents' Day and moved to always be on
Monday.
These holidays may have been good for a day off from school preceded by
an assembly with some speeches and such to break the normal classroom
routine, but they were not something I looked forward to like the
year-end holidays of a couple of months earlier. Neither were they a
reminder that the school year would eventually be ending. That happy day
was still far in the future. They were little more than just another
history lesson.
So even though days in February were often as not bright and sunny, my
memories of those February holidays feel kind of dull and gray.
*********************
There was also Valentine's Day. It had the advantage of being kind of
festive and playful, even though we didn't get the day off.
In elementary school we did a Valentine box every year.
This was a big cardboard box with a slot in the top, all decorated with
hearts and such. We were supposed to take valentines (probably mostly
store-bought by our parents), address them to various other kids of the
opposite sex, put them in envelopes, and drop them in the box. I don't
recall whether we signed them or sent them anonymously. There may have
been some of each.
Then on Valentine's Day the teacher would open the box and hand the
valentines out to whoever they were addressed to. We would count up how
many we had gotten, and show around any that we found especially
interesting. It was all a game, and I doubt that any of us really knew
what it meant to adults.
We all knew that eventually boys and girls were supposed to pair up and
fall in love and get married, and that all this may have had something to
do with where babies came from, but few if any of us knew how it worked.
And even if we did, it wasn't the kind of thing you were supposed to talk
about. There are lots of subjects that are discussed pretty openly now
that just weren't talked about back then.
As I recall, grades in which most of the kids were old enough to know how
to make babies didn't do Valentine boxes.
Does anybody still do Valentine boxes nowadays?
*********************
While we're reminiscing, I should mention that I did walk to school
through snow once. According to the Wikipedia article on "Snow in
Florida" the day I walked to school through snow was probably February
14, 1958. But I didn't get to walk back home through snow because it had
all melted by the time school let out.
No, I wasn't barefoot. I had shoes. And there were no hills to speak of
along the way. So I definitely had it easier than my parents and
grandparents.
*********************
Talking about how we walked to school through snow leads to thoughts of
people grumping about how the younger generation is doing all kinds of
things wrong.
But then I'm reminded that all present-day natural languages (as opposed
to constructed ones like Esperanto and Klingon) are the result of
generations of people speaking and writing older languages badly. So
getting stuff wrong may not be all bad.
*********************
This rainy season has been rather dry, as have the previous two or three,
so they're talking about ways to conserve water. We've been through this
before, and one bit of advice that always seems to come up is not to
flush toilets as often.
So I'm wondering if anyone has looked at those automated toilet-flushing
gizmos found in many public restrooms.
In my experience it's not unusual for an automatic toilet to flush
several times in a single session, often before I've done anything worthy
of even one flush.
On the other hand one person I mentioned this to said that she'd never
noticed this happening.
So are the things more sensitive to some people than to others, perhaps
due to differences in skin temperature or clothing or tendency to move
around? What has your experience been?
And assuming they really do flush more often than is really necessary,
can they be set to be less sensitive?
(I did a writeup on this in a previous issue of Silicon Soapware. See
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/SS0175.txt
and scroll down to the second topic, not counting the header stuff.)
*********************
Back on anniversaries, we're coming up on fifty years since the Beatles
appeared live on US prime-time TV, on the Ed Sullivan show.
I looked the performances up on YouTube. I'd forgotten how much things
had changed since 1964. For one thing, their hair wasn't all that long
by today's standards, although their style of combing it down over the
forehead may have made it seem longer. Also, they were wearing suits and
ties. That's still the norm in some musical genres, but not in rock.
Those weren't the only things that have changed since then, but they were
the most obvious ones I noticed while watching the videos.
*********************
Early February (records differ as to the exact date) also marks 21 years
since I got my first "real" Internet email address:
bubbles@well.sf.ca.us, since changed to bubbles@well.com.
Although I'd had a sort of an email address on Prodigy before that, it
didn't feel like a "real" Internet address the way the WELL address did.
Even if we could exchange messages with people on other services, the
emphasis was on communicating with other Prodigy users. And although I
don't recall details, I sort of have a feeling that it was kind of
"dumbed down" for non-tech folks. Whatever the actual details, it feels
like the Prodigy email somehow didn't count.
So I count the WELL address as my first "real" email address.
*********************
Valentine's Day reminds me of this:
Together
Together --
Feeling each other's warmth with only skin for separation.
Little tricks with fingers and tongue in strategic spots
and private places
Or just lying there
In each other's arms,
Legs entangled --
Intertwining of bodies.
Together --
Enjoying sharing whatever thoughts arise --
Intertwining of minds.
Together --
Face to face
Nose to nose
Lips to lips
Eye to eye
Gazing into each other's depths --
Intertwining of souls.
Thomas G. Digby
written 0330 hr 11/03/76
typed 0030 hr 11/06/76
entered 1655 hr 4/11/92
*********************
HOW TO GET SILICON SOAPWARE EMAILED TO YOU
There are two email lists, one that allows reader comments and one that
does not. Both are linked from
http://www.plergb.com/Mail_Lists/Silicon_Soapware_Zine-Pages.html
If you are already receiving Silicon Soapware you can tell which list you
are on by looking at the email headers.
If the headers include a line like this:
Silicon Soapware zine with reader comments <ss_talk@lists.plergb.com>
you are getting it via the list that allows comments (some software may
hide part of the line, but there should be enough visible to recognize
it).
To comment, simply email your comment to ss_talk@lists.plergb.com (which
you can often do by hitting "Reply All" or "Reply to List") from the
address at which you got the zine. The list will not accept comments
from non-member addresses.
If the Subject line includes the phrase "SS_Talk Digest" you are getting
the digest version. Otherwise you're getting individual items as they
are posted.
The address for posting comments is the same either way.
If, on the other hand, there's a line like
"Silicon Soapware no-reply" <ss_zineonly@plergb.com>
you're on the zine-only list. This list does not expect comments nor
does it accept replies for posting.
If you need to contact the author use bubbles@well.com or
bubbles@plergb.com.
If you are receiving Silicon Soapware and want to unsubscribe or
otherwise change settings, the relevant URL should be just below this
section in the copy you received.
Or you can use the plergb.com URL at the beginning of this section to
navigate to the appropriate subscription form, which will also allow you
to cancel your subscription or change your settings.
-- END --