Silicon Soapware #224
Mar. 14th, 2013 11:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
bubbleblowerSilicon Soapware #224 is out. Look in
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/SS0224.txt
or check out my main page at
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/SS0224.txt
or check out my main page at
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/
SILICON SOAPWARE
wafting your way along the slipstreams of the Info Highway
from Bubbles = Tom Digby
= bubbles@well.com
http://www.well.com/~bubbles/
Issue #224
New Moon of March 11, 2013
Contents copyright 2013 by Thomas G. Digby, and licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See the Creative
Commons site at http://creativecommons.org/ for details.
Silicon Soapware is available via email with or without reader feedback.
Details of how to sign up are at the end.
*********************
This year's Spring Equinox hasn't happened yet, but there are definite
signs of Spring. The days are getting longer, the weather is a bit
warmer and sunnier (although more chilly wet weather is possible), and
just a few nights ago this area set its clocks ahead for the summer.
Nowadays, unlike in days of yore, we don't have to actually set all those
clocks. Some, such as the ones in our computers and cell phones, are
smart enough to set themselves. Others, mostly hidden away in the
equivalent of an engine room, are on Universal (aka "Greenwich") time
which doesn't get reset for summer or winter. From their point of view
people (and the clocks most people are looking at) just sort of shift one
time zone in whichever direction is appropriate for the season.
But there are still a few clocks that aren't hooked into any such
automated system, and thus need to be reset manually. I can think of
five that I'll need to set, including the one in the car. So some
semblance of the tradition remains to mark the changing seasons.
Maybe in some year to come we won't really pay attention to the change at
all. One fine spring morning we'll just feel a bit less rested than
usual when the alarm goes off, and we may notice that it's darker outside
when we set out for the office and that it stays light later in the
evening, but we won't have to pay conscious attention to setting clocks
at all. There will be mention of the change in the news, but that's just
for people with old-fashioned clocks and most of us will more or less
ignore it.
And some gray-haired granddad will tell the kids about how when he was a
boy he had to set all his clocks by hand twice a year, back and forth
depending on the season, and if someone forgot to do that they had the
embarrassment of showing up at church or work or whatever an hour late or
early, depending on how they should have set their clocks.
He might also tell them he had to walk barefoot three miles through snow
to get there, but that will probably be an exaggeration, and even if it
happens to be true the kids may not believe him.
*********************
A discussion in another forum got me to thinking about the song, "Twinkle
Twinkle Little Star". According to the Wikipedia article it was first
published, as a nursery rhyme, in 1806. That makes the second line, the
one about wondering what the star is, more appropriate than it may seem
to us at first glance, because astronomers back then knew much less about
the nature of stars than they know now.
Of course there's still a fair amount we don't know about stars, so the
song isn't obsolete yet.
*********************
In some worlds parallel to ours where magic is stronger than it is here,
computers usually still work but tend to become rather cartoon-like.
That can be useful in that it is sometimes possible to persuade the
machine to do what you want it do to without all the nitpicking about
exact programming that we have to put up with here.
But there are dangers. For example, if some Web site seems to be loading
too slowly, resist the urge to speed it up by dragging that progress bar
that shows you how much has been accomplished so far. While that
sometimes seems to work (in contrast to this world, where it generally
has no effect), if you aren't careful you can create a data suckage
condition in which all the data from every other computer in the vicinity
ends up in your machine, leaving all the others empty.
Even if that doesn't cause widespread crashes, other users will be
unhappy at your computer having sucked up all their data. Worse, your
machine can destabilize into something like a supernova explosion or even
an information black hole into which specially trained and equipped
adventurers must venture, at great peril, to retrieve what bits and
pieces they can.
While some have returned from such explorations bearing great treasures
from realms never before conceived of by humans, others have been less
fortunate. Many never return.
So the standard advice for when something is loading slowly is to avoid
the temptation to drag the progress bar.
*********************
Prediction: A majority of children born today in the US will never learn
to drive or apply for a driver's license.
The reason? By the time today's kids reach driving age, self-driving
cars will be so common that driving will no longer be considered a
necessary skill for the general population. It will be looked on much as
horseback riding is today.
Since young drivers are statistically a high-risk group, there may be
considerable pressure, possibly in the form of higher insurance rates and
more restrictive licensing criteria, for them to let the car do the
driving. So even among those who apply for licenses, fewer may succeed
in getting them. And if one's chances of getting a license are smaller,
and there is not as much real need for it as there is now, many simply
won't bother applying.
*********************
Will self-driving cars offer a choice of driving style settings?
For example, it seems reasonable to offer a choice between optimizing for
fuel economy or for getting to your destination sooner, assuming both can
be done without significantly affecting safety.
I suspect the degree of allowable flexibility will depend on traffic
conditions at any given moment. If there's nobody else around you can
choose to go at the vehicle's most economical speed without worrying
about impatient people behind you. Or if you're in a hurry, you may
choose to go faster, assuming it's safe. On the other hand, when traffic
is heavy going with the flow and not gumming things up will take
priority.
Some people might prefer other options, such as having people notice
their expensive status-symbol vehicle. This is less likely to be
officially sanctioned, but some brands might have a subtle bias toward
that policy hidden in their programming, even if their ads only hint at
it.
Other options, such as expressing one's competitive macho manhood, are
unlikely to be legally available. But you might be able to find them on
some sort of underground hacker market.
Whatever happens will probably include a bunch of alternatives nobody
today has thought of yet.
*********************
More thoughts on the eventual transition from manually driven cars to
robots, especially as it may affect stunt drivers and automobile racing.
Will the sport of auto racing fade away, or will it remain as a specialty
thing, sort of like horse racing is today?
And what of stunt drivers in movies? Will they continue to be in demand,
or will advances in animation technology make them unnecessary? Or will
stunt-driving robots be developed?
Will live actors in general remain as important to movies as they are
today?
*********************
Thoughts of robots, along with other things in the news, reminded me of a
story titled "Good News from the Vatican" by Robert Silverberg. It's
about a robot being elected Pope. I'm pretty sure that won't happen
until long after robot cars become common, if ever, although you never
know.
A robot cleric would seem to have an advantage in that it would be immune
to human failings, although that may be balanced by other failings that
afflict robots but not humans. It could also be argued that to be
effective as a spiritual leader, one must share some of the nature of
those one is setting out to lead. That could be a point against robot
clergy serving humans.
But then again, who knows what new gods may show up tomorrow?
*********************
Recently I was having dinner with a bunch of people (mostly neither fan
nor Pagan). The dish I ordered came with a slice of garlic toast that I
didn't want. I asked if anyone else at the table wanted it. Nobody did.
So it sat there for an hour or two until the waitress eventually picked
it up and threw it away.
That led to thoughts of a new superhero. This person would come up to
anyone who looked like they were done eating but still had food on their
plate. He(?) would give the standard lecture about children starving in
some other country or wherever. If the person gave the standard rebuttal
about sending it to them, our hero would do just that. He would gather
up the uneaten food and fly, like Superman, to deliver it to whatever
children were most in need.
Details aren't fully set yet. Does he take plates of half-eaten food
away and come back a few minutes later with the plates all nice and
clean? Or does he avoid carrying those often-heavy china plates all over
the world and back by scraping everything into a sack which he carries
like some kind of reverse Santa Claus? Does he carry insulated Hot and
Cold containers, along with food safety guidelines? Questions are many,
while answers are few.
And no, he probably doesn't want kids to put uneaten food under their
pillow at night, like with teeth for the Tooth Fairy. That would get
real messy real fast. And, also unlike the Tooth Fairy, he doesn't hand
out money. That would just encourage people to leave more leftovers,
which is not what he wants to do. Also, he probably would just as soon
not get involved with the banking system and the credit card companies
and PayPal and all that. Keep it pure, and keep it simple.
*********************
One thought from a conversation at Pantheacon: There's a whole industry
based on making people ashamed of their bodies. They sell stuff to
"repair" or hide or otherwise deal with whatever it is about their bodies
people are ashamed of. And if people ever quit being ashamed, those
industries would be in deep trouble.
There are other industries based on the idea that people's bodies are
beautiful and can be made even more so.
These two categories, augmenting beauty and hiding defects, are fuzzy and
they overlap, but you can see the differences between them if you look
closely.
My personal preference is to support the beauty-enhancers but not the
shame-based stuff. Your preferences may vary.
*********************
THE SPEECH
With a dignified tap of his polished mahogany gavel
The chairman calls to order the annual meeting of
The Association of Distinguished Professors,
And introduces the man who will give
The keynote address:
Doctor So-and-So, Distinguished Professor
And author of a number of books,
With a Doctor of Dignity degree
From some prestige college.
Amid polite applause
This distinguished professor approaches the lectern,
Reaches into a hidden compartment,
And brings out a small plastic bottle.
Using the wand that came with the bottle,
He blows out over the audience
A cloud of bubbles.
"Speech" concluded, he returns to his seat.
The toastmaster feels impelled to summarize:
"The point Doctor So-and-So was making
Was that no matter how grown-up we appear on the outside,
There is still that child inside us all
Who must now and then be let out to play."
He drones on for a while about repression, and stress,
And life expectancies, and percentages of heart attacks,
And stuff like that until finally,
"While it is often important for us
As distinguished professors
To project a certain image to the world,
It is also important for us
As human beings
To now and then allow ourselves to play."
"That was indeed my point," replies the professor,
"And you have summarized it quite well.
However, just for the record,
I must remind you
That what I actually said was:"
And blows another cloud of bubbles.
written Oct 01 83 0415hr
entered Oct 24 83 0015hr
Thomas G. Digby
*********************
HOW TO GET SILICON SOAPWARE EMAILED TO YOU
There are two email lists, one that allows reader comments and one that
does not. Both are linked from
http://www.plergb.com/Mail_Lists/Silicon_Soapware_Zine-Pages.html
If you are already receiving Silicon Soapware you can tell which list you
are on by looking at the email headers.
If the headers include a line like this:
Silicon Soapware zine with reader comments <ss_talk@lists.plergb.com>
you are getting it via the list that allows comments (some software may
hide part of the line, but there should be enough visible to recognize
it).
To comment, simply email your comment to ss_talk@lists.plergb.com (which
you can often do by hitting "Reply All" or "Reply to List") from the
address at which you got the zine. The list will not accept comments
from non-member addresses.
If the Subject line includes the phrase "SS_Talk Digest" you are getting
the digest version. Otherwise you're getting individual items as they
are posted.
The address for posting comments is the same either way.
If, on the other hand, there's a line like
"Silicon Soapware no-reply" <ss_zineonly@plergb.com>
you're on the zine-only list. This list does not expect comments nor
does it accept replies for posting.
If you need to contact the author use bubbles@well.com or
bubbles@plergb.com.
If you are receiving Silicon Soapware and want to unsubscribe or
otherwise change settings, the relevant URL should be just below this
section in the copy you received.
Or you can use the plergb.com URL at the beginning of this section to
navigate to the appropriate subscription form, which will also allow you
to cancel your subscription or change your settings.
-- END --
